Time and spirited discussions occur on internet fora regarding an examination of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As characteristically happens, a few of the discussants begun to branch into other side discussions which really had nothing to do with the first questions or themes along with some even became a little exercised and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been required in order to get into the bottom of matters and where some times a topic is being discussed on a lot of distinct boards and several topics simultaneously on a given board! As too is typical, nothing has been really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about such issues coming up again and again and directing visitors to archives . Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that merely limited searching of past messages will be possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the archives sometimes are kept onto another yahoo site which means that this does not help things when everybody wants is to get a quick summary of what others are using and if possible their good reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings out more gall than good advice even though the aim of the person posing the question might have been quite commendable and maybe not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic traits!
Somewhere, across the path of the former quest, another topic got born and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the core of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers in the kind of harmonic graphs. Now this really is something that is found in Jyotish going back to nearly the initial memories of the earliest members in the forum who finally confessed to this type of case. I myself, though myself maybe not that mature, have seen horoscopes that were attracted from the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and thus forth and more importantly had commented on these graphs in his own reading. kalyan chart Therefore, at the very least some individuals had been utilizing varga-charts a handful of 100 years ago and possibly even ahead of these times.
Somewhere through the conversation, in another of the lists, a number of the members made available a post in which the author had voiced thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised in a graph format. A conversation ensued which side stepped the important and relevant matter of the practical merits of utilizing navamsha varga as an secondary graph. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics that indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be properly used and varga placements should just be useful for discovering the advantages of planets etc..
Now, those who have studied BPHS might knowthat 16 vargas had been characterized by the Sage beginning with rashi ehich is known as'kshetra' (field or area) and so on. This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not even a classic and published by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my term, not the original poster's!] In Jyotish and so can't be treated as being a classic. Obviously, there was some support to this could be similarly expected if some one should happen to make a comment that Jyotish had been just a derivative of astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. An issue that's been understood to bring even untoward jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To individuals who have been still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Additional varga kundalis will be the merchandise of corrupt understanding of the classics - which themselves many concur might not have survived in pure form [although a number of these have thankfully lived in reasonably good shape1]. Underlying that is the belief some can harbor that, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of their whole human anatomy as the submerged 9/10th is largely lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas and some of the secret documents which exist however jealously safeguarded by the custodian families. I don't know just how much of the iceberg postulate is based facts and how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists with this flow of thought, vargas MUST simply be applied as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and because of that consideration of these deities and primal forces those represent however, perhaps not in the form of a horoscope and certainly no serious consideration has to be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would maintain, for instance, that as the 2 nd house lord in navamsha is an important indicator, the fact that it is set in the second navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha chart) is not significant. Or, for instance, when Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, the two planets are not related (though they'd be portrayed to be conjoined in the same navamsha varga in a navamsha graph ).
(b) Regardless of if specifically described or perhaps not, one other stream of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have a significant role to play at Jyotish and possibly are of significant utility in identifying primary mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, for instance, would hold significant influence within matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha graph would be of similar import in the examination of children in a given nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a chart format.
In reality, most of these utilized theories from both (a) and (b) streams. There appeared to be some other individuals who totally denied the veracity of thought stream (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other causes, known only for them.