Time and again spirited negotiations occur on internet fora pertaining to an study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and karakamsha (that the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, a number of the discussants began to branch to other negative discussions which really had nothing related to the initial questions or topics and some became a bit exercised and emotional, as also usually happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been demanded to be able to get to the underside of things and where some times an interest has been discussed on several different boards and lots of topics simultaneously on a given board! As too is average, nothing has been really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those issues coming up again and again and again directing people to archives etc.. Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that only limited hunting of past messages is possible without losing most one's hair, and also the archives sometimes are kept onto another yahoo site so this will not help matters when everybody wants is to get a quick summary of what the others are using and if possible their good reasons for adopting a certain location! This latter usually brings out more gall than good advice though the aim of the person posing the question may have been very noble and not in any way confrontational.
Somewhere, along the path with this former pursuit, yet another topic got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the core of jyotish and have also been used by tropical astrologers in the form of harmonic charts. Now this really is some thing that is utilized in Jyotish going straight back to almost the initial memories of the earliest members in the forum that eventually confessed to this type of situation. I myself, even though myself perhaps not that mature, have seen horoscopes which were drawn from the century before where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus on and much more importantly had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan panel chart So, at the very least a lot of people had been utilizing varga-charts even a handful of hundred decades ago and possibly maybe even just before these times.
Somewhere during the conversation, in one of these lists, one of those associates made available an article in which the writer had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be used at a chart format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the important and applicable matter of these technical merits of utilizing navamsha varga being an secondary graph. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics that indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should only be useful for determining the features of planets .
This was really true and also a positive step forward in the conversation. There were parallel discussions going which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not a good classic and written by one or even a group of'latterday saints' [my word, not the initial poster!] In Jyotish and so can't be treated like being a timeless. Obviously, there was some support for this could possibly be similarly expected if some one were to create a comment that Jyotish was nothing but a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. A topic that has been understood to attract even untoward jyotishis on the"warpath!"
To individuals who have been still interested and intrigued by this, there looked to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be used. Other varga kundalis were the product of corrupt understanding of the classics - which themselves many agree might not have survived in pure form [although a few of these have mercifully lived in fairly great shape1]. Underlying this is the belief some can harbor that, equally the breeze, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of their whole human anatomy as the underwater 9/10th is largely lost and partly hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret documents which exist but jealously guarded by the custodian families. I do not know how much with this iceberg postulate is established facts and just how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists with this stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be applied as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also to that consideration of the deities and primal forces people represent although maybe not in the kind of a horoscope and certainly no critical consideration has to be given to aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for example, that while the 2nd dwelling lord in navamsha is an important indicator, the fact it is set in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd house in navamsha graph ) is not significant.
(b) Irrespective of if specifically described or perhaps not, the other stream of believing maintains that varga kundalis have a significant function to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in identifying chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, for example, would hold significant sway over matters of spouse and marriage, whilst saptamsha graph would be of import from the study of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas should be analyzed in a graph format.
In actuality, the majority of these utilized concepts from (a) and (b) streams. There seemed to be a few different individuals who totally denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a little taciturn about any of this, perhaps to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared in the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other reasons, known only to them.